Multipliers and Modulators


Why can't I use a multiplier as a modulator or mixer? Aren't they the same thing?

RAQ:  Issue 92


Not quite—and the difference is important.

A multiplier has two analog inputs and an output proportional to the product of the two amplitudes1.

VOUT = K × VIN1 × VIN2

where K is a constant with the dimension of 1/V. Either signal can be applied to either input and, in theory, the output will not be affected.

A modulator (or mixer) also has two inputs, but the signal input is linear, while the carrier input contains a limiting amplifier or is driven with a sufficiently large signal that it limits. In either case the carrier signal becomes a square wave, so its amplitude is relatively unimportant—as long as it is big enough—and its noise or amplitude variation will not appear at the output. The equation becomes


Multipliers are used for analog computation. One example is the calculation of power in a circuit. Signals proportional to the instantaneous voltage and current are applied to a multiplier’s inputs, and its output is proportional to the instantaneous power.

Like modulators, multipliers encode the amplitude of the signal input onto the signal at the carrier input, but unlike modulators, variations in the carrier signal amplitude also appear at their output. This variation is unwanted in communications applications where modulators are used. The simplified2 equation of a multiplier fed with two sine3 waves is


A simple description of a modulator often uses the same equation, but the clipping of the carrier signal to a square wave means that it contains odd harmonics. The simplified equation of a square wave is the odd harmonic Fourier series

V(t) = K[cos(ωt) – 1/3cos(3ωt) + 1/5cos(5ωt) – 1/7cos(7ωt) +…]

These odd harmonics are also modulated by the carrier, so the modulator output contains the desired fundamental products as well as products of the odd harmonics

V(t) = K[cos(ωSIGNAL + ωCARRIER)t + cos(ωSIGNAL – ωCARRIER)t

–1/3{cos(ωSIGNAL + 3ωCARRIER)t + cos(ωSIGNAL – 3ωCARRIER)t}

+1/5{cos(ωSIGNAL+5ωCARRIER)t + cos(ωSIGNAL – 5ωCARRIER)t}

–1/7{cos(ωSIGNAL + 7ωCARRIER)t + cos(ωSIGNAL – 7ωCARRIER)t} +…]

In many applications, these harmonic products are filtered and ignored, but a correct description of the modulator function must include them. Sometimes they are useful, and sometimes they overlap the fundamental products and cause unexpected results.

So before choosing a multiplier, modulator, or mixer, consider what you want to do, and which one will introduce the least error.

I invite you to comment on Multipliers and Modulators in the Analog Dialogue Community on EngineerZone.

1 The inputs and outputs may be voltages or currents depending on the device. This example uses voltages.

2 Input and output amplitudes are normalized for simplicity.

3 The equations use cosines as they are easier to manipulate. The final results are the same.

Bryant, James, Multipliers v Modulators



James Bryant

James Bryant was a European applications manager at Analog Devices from 1982 to his retirement in 2009 and he still writes and consults for the company. He holds a degree in physics and philosophy from the University of Leeds and is also C.Eng., EurEng., MIET, and an FBIS. In addition to his passion for engineering, James is a radio ham and holds the call sign G4CLF.