The Influence of a Power Supply Measurement Setup

When designing a power supply, it is important to test it intensively. For this task, hardware measurements are indispensable. Of course, a multitude of mistakes can creep in during such measurements. In this short power management tip, we will take a look at the effect of the connection line between the power supply under test and the load. If a board is quickly connected in the lab, the setup often looks like the one in Figure 1. Here, a long connection line connects the power supply under test to an electronic load, shown at the right. The two leads are lying arbitrarily with a relatively large loop area on the laboratory table.

Figure 1. Arbitrarily arranged connection line between a power supply board and load.

A much tidier setup is shown in Figure 2. Here, the two leads are twisted around each other to minimize the loop area in the circuit. In theory, this should lower the parasitic inductance of the connection line between the power supply under test and the load. That’s as far as the theory goes. But what effect do the different setups from Figure 1 and Figure 2 have on the measurements? To check this, we connected an ADP2386 evaluation board as a buck converter for an output current of up to 6 A in the two different arrangements shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, and then measured the output voltage response to load transients. This would show the real effect of an optimized connection line position. In the example, the ADP2386 converts a supply voltage of 5 V to an output voltage of 3.3 V. The load transient is generated with an electronic load and switches from 10 mA to 4 A within approximately 30 µs. In both cases, the connection line is 1 m long.

Figure 2. Carefully arranged connection line between a power supply board and load.

Figure 3 shows the voltage spike in the ac-coupled output voltage during the load transient response with a measurement setup as shown in Figure 1. The peak value is approximately 103 mV. In contrast, Figure 4 shows the measurement using a connection line with the leads tidily twisted around each other as in Figure 2. Here, the voltage spike in the output voltage is only approximately 96 mV. This corresponds to a difference of approximately 7 mV, which shows that the tidy arrangement of connection lines results in an approximately 7% improvement for this load transient test.

Figure 3. Output voltage load transient response with the connection line arranged arbitrarily as in Figure 1.

Figure 4. Output voltage load transient response with connection line arranged carefully as in Figure 2.

We can thus clearly see that a tidy measurement setup delivers much more exact results. Apart from the geometrical arrangement of the connection line between the power supply under test and the load, the cable length and the respective connection type—that is, alligator clips in this example or a solder joint—are also important. A shorter line has less parasitic inductance and less of an effect on the result of a load transient test. The shortest possible connection line should always be used.

Thus, it can be stated that leads twisted tidily together definitely have an effect on the measurement results, and therefore the additional effort needed to twist the leads for the measurement setup is justified.


Frederik Dostal

Frederik Dostal

Frederik Dostal是一名拥有20多年行业经验的电源管理专家。他曾就读于德国埃尔兰根大学微电子学专业并于2001年加入National Semiconductor公司,担任现场应用工程师,帮助客户在项目中实施电源管理解决方案,积累了丰富的经验。在此期间,他还在美国亚利桑那州凤凰城工作了4年,担任应用工程师,负责开关模式电源产品。他于2009年加入ADI公司,先后担任多个产品线和欧洲技术支持职位,具备广泛的设计和应用知识,目前担任电源管理专家。Frederik在ADI的德国慕尼黑分公司工作。